- About Us Who We Are, Contact Us, Get Involved
- Community Join and News
- Join
- News
- Through the lens: A Snapshot of the Wild Northwoods
- A Multiview of Wilderness
- A Tour Through Missouri Wilderness
- Stories from a Small Town
- Missouri Wilderness: A Hidden Gem
- Following in the Footsteps of Bob Marshall - Using the Past to Manage for the Future
- Prince William Sound: An Alaskan Gem
- Generation Green: Wilderness Stewardship in Desolation
- About a Glacier
- SWS Looking for Board Members!
- Climbing a Mountain: A Blog Post on Wilderness Character Monitoring
- Wilderness Management Distance Education Program: Online Course Announcement
- Wilderness Information Management Steering Team September Webinars
- A Journey Into the Gros Ventre
- A Retrospective of the Olympic Wilderness and Wilderness Management, Part I
- A Retrospective of the Olympic Wilderness and Wilderness Management, Part II
- At the Intersection of Wilderness, Fire and Climate Change: Challenges and Opportunities in Wilderness Stewardship
- Breathe, Water. Breathe, Switchback. Breathe, Peak.
- Chair Dave Campbell on Wilderness Fire Science
- Christina Mills, Yellowstone Outdoor Recreation Planner
- Climate Change and Wilderness Areas
- Edward Abbey: Wilderness Firebrand
- Emerging Technologies in Wilderness DISCUSSION
- Howard Zahniser: Putting Ideas to Work
- Human Influence and Intervention
- Moose, Newts, Apple Trees and History
- Mountains Without Handrails: Wilderness Without Bikes
- Question: Everything
- SWS Board Member On the Public Lands Debate
- Solitude and Visitor Use
- Technology
- Tribute to Wilderness Leader Bob Lucas
- Value of the Land
- Wilderness Character: A Concept
- Wilderness in Fossil Ridge
- Speaker Series
- Education Academies and Certificates
- Research Wilderness Fellows and Wilderness Workshop
- Support Shop and Donate
Emerging Technologies in Wilderness DISCUSSION
h.macslarrow - January 26, 2016
The Society for Wilderness Stewardship's (SWS) Stewardship Committee recently developed a white paper regarding emerging technologies and their intersection with wilderness values, experiences, attitudes, and management. The authors frame the central issue as follows:
"The use of new technology in and outside of wilderness has the potential to change how wilderness is perceived and visited as well as how it is managed. The impacts may be positive or negative and could affect the opportunities for a wilderness experience, the biophysical resources of wilderness, and, for some, the very meaning of wilderness. Changes in any of these variables will also influence the future management of wilderness."
Through evaluating trends in technological advance such as the use of unmanned aerial systems, personal locator beacons, cell phones, availability of electronic trip information, user expectation of technologic advancement, commercial use of technology, management paradigms, webcams and virtual hikes, geocaching, light weight equipment, and advanced trail construction methodology, the authors raise the questions:
Does ease of route-finding and availability of electronic trip information make wilderness more accessible, and therefore alter user experience from "the traditional perception..of discovery and the challenge of a wild and natural environment"? Does it also encourage increased use of fragile travel corridors, especially on non-hardened surfaces?
Do handheld devices, such as cell phones or personal locator beacons, create a false sense of safety, and lead to a decrease in backcountry proficiency in wilderness users, and therefore an increase in user risk and emergency management?
Is there a potential for users perceiving less differentiation between wilderness and non-wilderness due to increase in accessibility and domination of wild landscapes present in wilderness?
How should the above questions be weighed against the potential positive impact of greater or longer visitation in wilderness arising from advanced gear and recreational equipment? Though differentiation of wildernss may suffer, does increased accessibility make it more desirable to protect wilderness and the wilderness experience?
How should wilderness managers address these issues? Policy creation or individual response? Discouragement of technologic use or leverage of technology to communicate with user groups?
We want to hear from you. Respond back with your answers to the questions stated above, or give an example of how emerging technology is changing your management approach, visitor experiences, or perception of wilderness.
Add new comment